You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 4, April 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

GROWTH OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE HUMAN EYEBALL

I. DIAGRAMS, CALCULATIONS, COMPUTATION AND REFERENCE TABLES

HARRY A. WILMER, M.D., Ph.D.; RICHARD E. SCAMMON, Ph.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1950;43(4):599-619.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

QUANTITATIVE data on the dimensions of the eyeball as a whole and on many of its component structures have been reported in the medical and biologic literature over a long period. A number of observations have been visualized in the form of two dimensional reconstructions, commonly of median sagittal sections of the eyeball and its parts. Many of these figures are frankly schematic or semischematic. Nonetheless, they fulfil the purpose for which they were constructed, for they give clear, useful and approximately correct representations of the mean size and the spatial relations of the optic apparatus. A smaller number of two dimensional reconstructions have been made with particular attention to the exact quantitative data on the dimensions involved, and these are sometimes accompanied with extensive tabulations of these data. Perhaps the more notable of this second type of reconstructions are those of Merkel and Orr1 (fig. 1 a the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PALO ALTO, CALIF.; BRANSON, MO.


Footnotes

Now at the Palo Alto Clinic, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry; formerly Fellow in Neurology and Psychiatry, Mayo Foundation.

Graduate School, University of Minnesota.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.