You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 5, May 1949 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (64)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PERSISTENCE AND HYPERPLASIA OF PRIMARY VITREOUS; RETROLENTAL FIBROPLASIA-TWO ENTITIES

ALGERNON B. REESE, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1949;41(5):527-552.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CONSIDERABLE attention has been given to blindness of infants,1 especially premature infants, due to a condition or conditions called by such various terms as retrolental fibroplasia, persistence and hyperplasia of the primary vitreous, remains of the tunica vasculosa lentis and congenital encephalo-ophthalmic dysplasia. All agree that there has been a large increase in the incidence of this type of blindness.

At the Institute of Ophthalmology, we have seen 202 cases and 128 of these have occurred in the past three years. At the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary2 165 blind preschool children are recorded as residing in Massachusetts, and in 108 of these the blindness is due to retrolental fibroplasia.

As the high incidence of the disease has occurred only in the past ten or more years, and as the disease prior to this period was extremely rare, ophthalmologists over the country have not all incorporated the diagnosis . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

From the Institute of Ophthalmology of the Presbyterian Hospital in the City of New York.


Footnotes

This work was supported by a donation from Mr. Charles B. Wrightsman.

Read before the Section on Ophthalmology at the Ninety-Seventh Annual Session of the American Medical Association, Chicago, June 23, 1948.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1949 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.