You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 40 No. 4, October 1948 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

STUDIES IN EXPERIMENTAL OCULAR TUBERCULOSIS

XII. Effect of Streptomycin and "Promizole" on Experimental Ocular Tuberculosis in the Immune-Allergic Rabbit

ALAN C. WOODS, M.D.; RONALD M. WOOD, B.S.

Arch Ophthal. 1948;40(4):413-432.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN PREVIOUS communications1 there were reported the results of experiments which dealt with the possible therapeutic effect of one antibiotic and two chemotherapeutic agents on experimental ocular tuberculosis. It was found la that penicillin G, given in enormous doses, has no deterrent action on the progress of ocular tuberculosis in the normal (nonimmune) rabbit. It was further reported 1b,c that two sulfones, "promin" (N,N'-didextrose sulfonate, the sodium salt of p,p'-diaminodiphenyl sulfone) and "promizole" (4,2'-diaminophenyl-5'-thiazolylsulfone) had a deterrent effect on the ocular disease. This was apparent in both the immune-allergic and the normal rabbit, although in the normal animal the effect was not marked. In the normal rabbit, a slight decrease in the ocular inflammation was noted at the end of the second week of treatment, and this was clinically most noticeable after eight weeks of treatment. However, transmission experiments of inoculum from the eyes of the treated animals at . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute of the Johns Hopkins Hospital and University.


Footnotes

This investigation was supported by a grant from the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation.

Read before the Section on Ophthalmology at the Ninety-Seventh Annual Session of the American Medical Association, Chicago, June 25, 1948.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1948 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.