You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 36 No. 5, November 1946 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

DIISOPROPYL FLUOROPHOSPHATE ("DFP") IN TREATMENT OF GLAUCOMA

James E. Lebensohn, M. D.
Chicago.

Arch Ophthal. 1946;36(5):621-622.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor:

—The advent of diisopropyl fluorophosphate ("DFP") in ophthalmology probably marks a significant advance in the medical control of glaucoma. The disconcerting ciliary spasm and after-blur, however, will limit its field to cases of glaucoma inadequately controlled by the previously known antiglaucomatous drugs, as intimated by Leopold and Comroe in their introductory article (Use of Diisopropyl Fluorophosphate in the Treatment of Glaucoma, ARCH. OPHTH.36: 1 [July] 1946.

About five months ago Dr. Leopold graciously sent me a generous supply of "DFP," which my associates and I have been using in selected cases at Cook County Hospital and at the Veterans Administration Facility, Hines, Ill., as well as in private practice. The optimum results have generally been obtained with a 0.05 per cent solution administered morning and evening. Stronger solutions cause more discomfort, and in cases in which the 0.05 per cent concentration has failed to lower the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1946 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.