You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 24 No. 3, September 1940 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF TESTS OF DARK ADAPTATION

ROBB McDONALD, M.D.; FRANCIS H. ADLER, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1940;24(3):447-461.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The tests which are commonly employed for estimating visual function are carried out with the light-adapted patient. The acuity of the fovea is determined under optimal conditions of illumination, which means that the test chart is illuminated by at least 20 or more foot candles. Similarly, the isopters of the peripheral field are determined with white or colored test objects which reflect sufficient light to stimulate the peripheral portions of the light-adapted retina. Throughout the field areas of depressed function are detected in the photopic retina. The result of these tests allow us to evaluate the functional capacity of the photopic retina.

The retina behaves differently in the dark-adapted state, however, and there are well known diseased conditions in which it is normal when light adapted but is grossly abnormal in semidarkness. Numerous tests have been devised to measure its function in the dark-adapted state, and the literature is now . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PHILADELPHIA


Footnotes

Research Fellow in Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania.

Part of a study conducted under a grant from the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation.

Read before the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, Section on Ophthalmology, Dec. 21, 1939.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1940 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.