This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS

CLARA BURRI, Ph.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1938;19(3):409-424.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

During the past three or four years the concept of abnormal retinal correspondence or abnormal projection has claimed more and more attention among workers in the field of orthoptic training, with the consequence that testing for abnomal retinal correspondence has become one of the most important procedures in the routine examination of patients with squint. Accordingly, if one is a squinter one of three outcomes seems possible: One may practice complete suppression of one eye ; one may use either eye alternatingly, or abnormal retinal correspondence or abnormal projection may develop. Should one happen to belong to the group in which the last outcome has developed, a slow process of reeducation, which, according to some authorities, seems almost impossible, is necessary before it may be hoped to straighten the eyes by any orthoptic measure or even to keep them straight after an operative procedure. If this is so, what condition . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
CHICAGO

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Medical School.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?