This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

GEORGE P. GUIBOR, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1934;12(6):887-901.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A preliminary report of the possibilities of orthoptic training was presented before the Section on Ophthalmology of the American Medical Association in June 1933. The present report covers the patients included in that report and additional ones who have been accepted for treatment and observed for at least six months. Since the previous report an article by Cantonnet¹ has appeared. Certain classes of strabismus are described which are difficult to remedy. These include strabismus with false macula, the incidence of which among cases of squint he places at 0.5 per cent, and strabismus with paradoxical diplopia, which need not be described here. He believes that patients with strabismus of these types can be reeducated, though with great difficulty.

In contradistinction to many authors, Cantonnet does not believe that fusion training is practical under the age of 5. The upper age limit is much higher than that given by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
CHICAGO

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Medical School, and the Children's Memorial Hospital.

Footnotes
Read before the Section on Ophthalmology at the Eighty-Fifth Annual Session of the American Medical Association, Cleveland, June 14, 1934.

This study was done with the aid of a fellowship supplied by the Knapp Testimonial Fund and a grant from the Academy of Ophthalmology.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?