This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

P. CHALMERS JAMESON, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1934;12(3):377-379.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A perusal of the history of advancement and resection shows not only a succession of new operations but constant variations in and modifications of original operations. And with few exceptions the new operations on muscles and the modifications of existing operations have been based on changes in the arrangement and placement of sutures.

The basis of these devices is the common desire for an arrangement of the sutures which will guard against the tendency of the muscle end under tension to retract or pull away from the position in which it was placed—a happening which, as every surgeon will admit, contributes to destabilization of end-results by lessening the corrective effect computed by the operator.

It is easy to see how a single suture through the muscle and stump can cut through the interstices between the muscle fibers under tension ; and even the common method of underlooping the muscle, although . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
BROOKLYN

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?