You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS AND SMALL CASE SERIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Catastrophic Complications of Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty

Robert F. Friedman, MD; James Chodosh, MD; Thomas C. Wolf, MD
Oklahoma City, Okla

Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(7):925-926.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Automated lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) and its stepchild, laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), are emerging treatments for the correction of myopia and hyperopia. We describe 3 patients with severe complications of ALK and poor visual outcomes.

Report of Cases.

Case 1.

A 33-year-old man underwent uncomplicated ALK in the left eye for 2.25 diopters (D) of hyperopia. On the first postoperative day, the bandage contact lens was removed and the patient noted a foreign body sensation and decreased vision. He presented to the Dean A. McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Okla, 2 months later with a refractive error of 16.75 + 1.50x65 and a visual acuity of 20/125 OS. Slit-lamp examination of the left eye revealed an absent corneal cap (Figure 1). The corneal bed was thinned and scarred. The patient declined corneal transplantation.

Case 2.

A 32-year-old woman had refractive findings and a visual acuity of –9.00+2.00x105 and 20/25 OD and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.