You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 11, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS AND SMALL CASE SERIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fluctuating Vision in Best Disease

Donald W. Park, MD; Timothy D. Polk, MD; Edwin M. Stone, MD, PhD
Iowa City, Iowa

Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(11):1469-1470.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Best disease is a vitelliform macular dystrophy characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance, an abnormal electrooculogram, a normal electroretinogram, and a variety of fundus lesions.1-4 We describe 2 patients from 2 well-characterized families with Best disease1,3 who experienced transient visual loss with little or no change in the ophthalmoscopic appearance of their central vitelliform lesions.

Report of Cases.

Case 1.

A 28-year-old man lost the central vision in his left eye 13 years ago from subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. He returned complaining of rapid loss of vision in his right eye during a 10-day period. He had no medical problems and was not receiving medication. Visual acuity measured 20/100 OD and 20/200 OS. In the right macula, the vitelliform lesion had slightly less yellowish material and more pigmentary changes than in the photographs taken 13 years earlier, but neither clinical examination nor fluorescein angiography showed any evidence of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.