You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 6, June 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Case Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Management of Ablation Decentration Following Excimer Photorefractive Keratectomy

Jonathan H. Talamo, MD; Michael D. Wagoner, MD; Stephen Y. Lee, MD
Boston, Mass

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(6):706-707.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

As with any keratorefractive procedure, the results of excimer photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are dependent on accurate centration. Although ablation decentration is a recognized complication, to our knowledge, methods for correction of this uncommon but significant complication have not been described in detail. We report herein a case of successful management.

Report of a Case.

A healthy 24-year-old man underwent excimer PRK in the left eye (6.0-mm ablation zone) with a VISX 2020 excimer laser (VISX, Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) as part of a Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational study. Preoperative visual acuity was 20/20 OS, with a manifest and cycloplegic refraction of – 7.75 –0.25 X170 diopters (D) and otherwise normal results of an ocular examination. Postoperatively, the treatment zone was noted to be nasally decentered. One year later, the patient still complained of glare and distortion, with uncorrected visual acuity of 20/70 correcting to 20/30 and a manifest refraction . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.