This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David G. Hunter, MD, PhD
Baltimore, Md

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(4):404.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Dr Keltner's Editorial¹ in the May 1994 issue of the ARCHIVES clarified the benefits of strabismus surgery, but he did not sufficiently emphasize how patients with no potential for binocular vision are helped by surgery. It is important to recognize that strabismus is not a cosmetic defect because it is not simply a subjective departure from a patient's concept of beauty and because it is not a natural consequence of aging. Instead, strabismus is the end result of a disease process (namely, defective binocular vision),and it results in a disability (namely, the loss of normal eye contact with others). Thus, strabismus is a deformity, much as an extra finger on the hand or a benign neoplastic mass on the face is a deformity.

Dr Keltner noted that strabismus may have serious psychosocial complications. Unfortunately, medical "gatekeepers" are not likely to be sympathetic to a discussion of psychology. Instead, it should . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?