This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Peter A. Campochiaro, MD; Aminoglycoside Study Group
Baltimore, Md

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(3):263.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

We would like to thank Dr Grizzard for his interest in our article and for providing us an opportunity to discuss the letter that he wrote in response to the letter by Judson.¹ Dr Grizzard implies that the publication of his letter lends credence to the hypothesis it presents; however, every piece of literature must be judged by its content and derives no value merely from the fact that it was published. In his letter, Dr Grizzard suggests that the geographic pattern of damage seen in the patient described by Judson, which is similar to that seen in our patients, was due to optic nerve trauma from a retrobulbar needle because he believes that they are similar in appearance to cases reported by Sullivan et al² and Paulter et al.³ However, the fundi and fluorescein angiograms in both of these articles show important differences from . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?