• Online Features  This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Oral Presentations, Scientific Publications, and 'The Times'

Richard Parrish II, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(9):1157-1158.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MEDICAL SCIENTISTS as authors and speakers are being forced into a dilemma: the oral presentation of new information at a scientific meeting may jeopardize consideration of that information for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. This problem came home after I had presented a paper at the 10th International Congress of Eye Research held in Stresa, Italy, on September 21, 1993. Having been invited to present an original scientific work previously by one of the session chairmen, I had not given either oral or written consent to the video or audio recording of the presentation. Copyright ownership was not assigned to either the journal, Experimental Eye Research, which had previously published the meeting abstracts, or the organizers of the congress, the International Society for Eye Research.¹ To my surprise, within 1 month, I received a galley proof by way of facsimile transmission from one of the ophthalmologic tabloids that contained . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?