You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Rigor of Research Methods in Studies of the Effectiveness and Safety of Cataract Extraction With Intraocular Lens Implantation-Reply

Neil R. Powe, MD, MPH, MBA; Oliver D. Schein, MD, MPH; James M. Tielsch, PhD; Earl P. Steinberg, MD, MPP
Baltimore, Md

Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(7):875.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

We appreciate the thoughtful comments of Dr Chynn. Our synthesis of the literature on cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation was undertaken to examine the nature and the strength of the evidence generated over the past decade regarding the outcomes of modern cataract surgery. We hope that our review of the rigor of published studies promotes the continuous improvement of the quality of future clinical studies of cataract surgery so that physicians will have sound data on which to base their clinical decisions. This is particularly important in a climate in which resource constraints create pressures that might erode the quality of care.

Dr Chynn makes the point that every research study is likely to have limitations, including the review we undertook. We agree. Although we attempted to perform masked abstractions of all the articles we reviewed, it is possible that in some instances our reviewers recognized an . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.