You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 1, January 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

High-Dose Corticosteroid Regimen Retards Development of Multiple Sclerosis in Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

Jonathan D. Trobe, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(1):35-36.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ON DECEMBER 9,1993, the New England Journal of Medicine reported the latest and most important finding from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT).1 Intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g/d for 3 days), followed by oral prednisone (1 mg/kg per day for 11 days), prescribed for patients with acute, isolated optic neuritis, reduced the 2-year incidence of definite multiple sclerosis (MS) by more than 50%.

Definite MS was diagnosed in the ONTT as soon as the patient experienced a new neurologic development, excluding recurrent optic neuritis, at least 4 weeks after entry, and was accompanied by appropriate physical abnormalities noted by the study neurologist. Among the 389 patients in the ONTT who did not have MS at study entry, 10 (7.5%) of 134 intravenously treated patients developed at least one such neurologic event within 2 years compared with 21 (16.7%) of 126 placebo-treated patients. This was an impressive difference. The relative risk . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Ann Arbor, Mich



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.