You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 9, September 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Updating Keratospeak IV-Reply

George O. Waring III, MD
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(9):1167.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

Koch's amendments to "Keratospeak IV" are accurate and clarify the options available to the surgeon. Look for them in "Keratospeak V." However, we will have to restrict our classification as an increasing number of lasers become available that perform essentially the same function; we will simply include them under a single category such as "laser intrastromal photodisruption." This is what we do now with "keratomileusis using a microkeratome"; we do not list every style of microkeratome that is used. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.