This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Kurt Simons, PhD
Baltimore, Md

Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(3):297-298.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Taylor et al¹ report that visible light, particularly blue light (400 to 500 nm), may be a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) based on possible photo-oxidative stress, although no equivalent risk was found for UV-B (290 to 320 nm) or UV-A (320 to 400 nm) exposure. May I suggest that two variables explicitly excluded from this study may affect such risk, particularly in combination? One is "indoor exposure,"¹ which I take to mean artificial light. Indoor and outdoor ambient illumination intensity levels derived from such sources as the ubiquitous fluorescent or mercury-vapor streetlight are typically 1.5 to 3 log units (ie, 30 to 1000 times) below outdoor daylight levels, although many illuminance standards in lighting have increased in intensity by a factor of 2 to 3 from what they were a generation ago. The stared-at phosphors of television and computer displays fall in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?