You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 1, January 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Peripapillary Subretinal Neovascularization Associated With Multiple Evanescent White-Dot Syndrome

C. James McCollum, MD; James A. Kimble, MD
Birmingham, Ala

Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(1):13-15.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In the October 1990 issue of the ARCHIVES, Wyhinny et al1 reported a case of subfoveal neovascular membrane developing 6 months after an episode of multiple evanescent white-dot syndrome (MEWDS) in a young woman. We report a similar case with development of peripapillary, rather than macular, subretinal neovascularization (SRNV).

Report of a Case.

—A 27-year-old woman was referred to our office 10 days after the onset of biopsy-proved chickenpox with a complaint of blurred vision in her left eye associated with multiple small dark spots in her central visual field. The referring ophthalmologist had examined her twice, noting small yellow focal lesions in the left macula on the second visit that had not been present 4 days earlier on first examination.

Examination in our office revealed a visual acuity of 20/20 OD and 20/50- OS with no afferent pupillary defect. No anterior chamber cells were present . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.