You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 6, June 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pigmented Episcleral Mass From Argyrosis Following Strabismus Surgery

George B. Bartley, MD; Cheryl R. Buller, MS; R. Jean Campbell, MB, ChB
Rochester, Minn

John D. Bullock, MD
Dayton, Ohio

Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(6):775-776.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A large, pigmented episcleral mass is likely to be a malignant melanoma. We treated a patient with a "pseudomelanoma" that was secondary to localized silver deposition.

Report of a Case.

—An 85-year-old man presented for a routine ophthalmic examination. His pertinent history included strabismus surgery of the left eye 67 years earlier. The most significant finding was a large conjunctival and episcleral pigmented mass localized over the insertion of the left lateral rectus muscle, with a symblepharon to the left lateral canthus (Fig 1). The patient was uncertain of the lesion's duration. The mass was grayish black, showed minimal intrinsic vascularity, and did not move freely with the conjunctiva. No corresponding intraocular pigmentation was present, the conjunctiva was otherwise clear, and the remainder of the ophthalmic and general physical examination findings were unremarkable. A history of eyedropuse was indeterminate.

The diagnosis was a benign pigmented episcleral lesion, related to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.