You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 4, April 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEWS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cataract Surgery: Perspectives From Ophthalmic Surgery

by George W. Weinstein and George L. Spaeth, 131 pp, Thorofare, NJ, Slack Inc, 1987, $35.

Elliot Finkelstein, MD, Reviewer
Brookline, Mass

Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(4):493-494.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Cataract Surgery:

Perspectives From Ophthalmic Surgery is an unusual soft-covered text written by George W. Weinstein and George L. Spaeth, the editors of Ophthalmic Surgery. They review the changes in cataract surgery during the past 15 years by providing summaries of 325 articles from the journal that they have edited. Their goal is not so much to present a review of history as it is an attempt to demonstrate that many decisions are made by surgeons on the basis of poorly conceived studies and misinterpretations based on inadequate data. They also bring attention to the many opportunities to acquire valuable knowledge that have been missed because of poorly designed clinical research.

" 'Truth is an error that is temporarily irrefutable.' "

Throughout the text, summaries of articles that presented "advances" in modern cataract surgery are recalled, and the errors in study design or interpretation are noted. Undoubtedly, this is easier . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.