You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEWS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians

edited by M. Princeton Nadler, David Miller, and Daniel J. Nadler, 150 pp with illus, New York, NY, Springer-Verlag NY Inc, 1990, $69.

John J. Gittinger, MD, Reviewer
Worcester, Mass

Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(10):1392.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Visual acuity and visual fields are the most commonly used measures of vision, but clinicians and visual scientists have become increasingly aware of their limitations. The authors of this monograph have brought together information about two other parameters by which vision can be assessed: the contrast sensitivity function and the related effects of glare. Basic scientists, optometrists, and ophthalmologists approach these subjects from different perspectives in their reviews.

"... useful to anyone with an interest in visual function testing."

The book is well illustrated, with generous use of color plates. A glossary is appended to allow translation of what is necessarily a complex terminology. The editors are obviously enthusiastic about their topics, but take pains to point out that contrast sensitivity or glare testing should not be used as an excuse to perform marginal surgery, and even allow critical evaluation of their own glare-testing device.

Several of the contributors point out . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.