You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 108 No. 1, January 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Scleral Buckling After Failed Air Injection Pneumatic Retinopexy

Moiz M. Carim, MD
Reading, Pa

Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(1):11.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Lewen and Eifrig,1 in the January 1988 issue of the ARCHIVES, reported a case of air injection pneumatic retinopexy that was complicated by subretinal air. The retina was successfully reattached using a scleral buckling procedure and intravitreal air tamponade.

I have been using intravitreal injections of filtered room air to tamponade the retinal break and cryotherapy to create a chorioretinal adhesion for repair of selected retinal detachments. More than 30 operations have now been performed. Initially, approximately 1 mL of intravitreal air was used, although now I routinely use 0.35 to 0.4 mL of air, which appears to be sufficient to tamponade small breaks. The preliminary findings were presented at the Pneumatic Retinopexy Symposium, held in San Diego, Calif, in August 1988.

Lewen and Eifrig stated that the air bubble was inadequate in size to tamponade the retinal break approximately 6 hours later. This cannot be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

Drs Lewen and Eifrig chose not to respond.—Ed.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.