This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Walter J. Stark, MD; Alfred Sommer, MD; Ronald E. Smith, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(10):1441-1444.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Congress and the Health Care Finance Administration have recently targeted cataract extraction procedures for particular scrutiny and cost containment. The reasons have been amply stated: cataract surgery now accounts for 12% of the entire Medicare budget and is presently the most frequently performed surgical procedure reimbursed by Medicare.¹ Given the apparent threefold or greater increase in the annual number of cataract operations in the past decade and the prediction by some that the number of intraocular lens (IOL) implantations will approach 2 million per year,² regulators view cataract surgery as a growing threat to the health care budget.

The Health Care Finance Administration has tried, largely in vain, to contain costs by reducing reimbursement. Increasing attention is therefore being given to the indications for surgery and ways to reduce what appears to be the inexorable growth in the number of cataract operations. Continued collection and analysis of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Baltimore, Md; Los Angeles, Calif

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?