You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 10, October 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medial Rectus Injury After Pterygium Excision

Edward L. Raab, MD
New York, NY

Henry S. Metz, MD
Rochester, NY

Forrest D. Ellis, MD
Indianapolis, Ind

Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(10):1428.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Extraocular muscle injury is an unusual sequela of pterygium surgery, although the area of dissection is just adjacent to these structures.1-3 We have seen three patients who experienced the acute onset of horizontal diplopia following excision of a nasal pterygium. In all patients, noncomitant exotropia and marked adduction deficiency were observed.

Report of Cases.

CASE 1.

—A 53-year-old woman noted horizontal diplopia immediately following excision of an extensive nasal pterygium of the left eye. When seen on the fourth postoperative day, adduction was possible only to the midline, with observably slow nasal saccades and exotropia (Fig 1). The nasal sclera of the eye operated on was bare from the limbus for about 9 mm. On the following day, surgical exploration was performed. The traction test indicated no restrictions. The left medial rectus was found to be disinserted and was reattached just behind its original insertion . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.