You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Macular Hole Secondary to Pneumatic Retinopexy

Paul E. Runge, MD; George J. Wyhinny, MD
Chicago

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(5):586-587.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Pneumatic retinopexy with expandable gas is gaining popularity as an alternative method of treating superior rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Several complications have been reported with this procedure. We recently observed the occurrence of a macular hole in one patient that developed shortly after she received an intraocular injection of sulfur hexafluoride. We believe that the macular hole was related to and is an important complication of this procedure.

Report of a Case.

—A 64-year-old woman presented with a one-week history of blurred vision in her right eye. Best corrected visual acuity was 20/200 OD. Retinal examination revealed a very bullous detachment from the 8-o'clock to 2:30 positions in a clockwise direction. Two semilunar tears and a small round hole were noted at the 1-o'clock position; a round hole on flat retina was visualized at the 5:30 position. The macula was detached but otherwise intact (Figure).

The patient was . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.