You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 3, March 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEWS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Manual of Corneal Surgery

edited by William E. Bruner, Walter J. Stark, and A. Edward Maumenee, 134 pp, with illus, New York, Churchill Livingstone Inc, 1987, $32.

Ann M. Bajart, MD, Reviewer
Boston

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(3):320.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Manual of Corneal Surgery, edited by Bruner, Stark, and Maumenee, is a well-organized, concise overview of surgical techniques, useful to the general ophthalmologist as well as corneal surgeons, students, residents, and fellows. The book is divided into 13 chapters written by 17 acknowledged experts.

"... it is the best medical textbook buy of the year."

Anatomy, with its clinical relevance, is well covered. A practical chapter on preoperative evaluation includes excellent discussions of potential acuity tests, prognostic factors, and the recipient environment, both physical and socioeconomic. Five chapters are devoted to keratoplasty. The chapter on penetrating keratoplasty contains many very practical details and pearls of advice carefully elucidated by the very experienced authors. They adequately illustrate such points as tying the running suture and reforming the anterior chamber. My major criticism of the entire book lies in these authors' startling and highly questionable statement: "A small wound leak or a leakage . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.