You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 11, November 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Branhamella Keratitis Resistant to Penicillin and Cephalosporins

Marian S. Macsai, MD; David S. Hillman, MD; Jeffrey B. Robin, MD
Chicago

Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(11):1506-1507.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

Branhamella catarrhalis, a gram-negative diplococcus, is generally considered to be nonpathogenic. To date, only ten cases of keratitis caused by this organism have been reported.1,2 All of these infections proved to be sensitive to penicillin or a first-generation cephalosporin. Herein we report a case of rapidly progressive B catarrhalis keratitis that was resistant to both penicillin and a first-generation and two third-generation cephalosporins.

Report of a Case.

—A 46-year-old debilitated man with a history of chronic alcoholism presented with a six-day history of pain and decreased vision in the right eye. Examination disclosed best corrected visual acuities of light perception in the right eye and 20/30 OS. A bilateral blepharitis was noted. Slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination of the right cornea demonstrated a 4 x 5-mm inferonasal epithelial defect with an underlying stromal infiltrate. No hypopyon was present. The intraocular pressure in the right eye was 28 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.