You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 8, August 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CASE REPORTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Delayed, Incomplete Recovery of Macular Function After Photic Retinal Damage Associated With Extracapsular Cataract Extraction and Posterior Lens Insertion

Saunders L. Hupp, MD
Mobile, Ala

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(8):1022-1023.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Photic retinal damage has been shown to be associated with exposure to the light from the operating microscope in aphakic, phakic, or pseudophakic eyes, even in the presence of an ultraviolet filter.1,2 I wish to describe a patient who suffered photic retinal damage during an extracapuslar cataract extraction with posterior lens insertion that resulted in profound visual acuity loss (20/400), noted the first day postoperatively and persisting for four weeks. The patient's visual acuity eventually returned to 20/20, but she was left with a paracentral scotoma and macular dysfunction such that exposure to a bright light would cause a marked loss of acuity that would persist for many minutes.

Method.

—The operation was performed using a Week model 1206 ceiling-mounted microscope with coaxial fiberoptic illumination, fitted with an ultraviolet filter (Edward Weck and Co Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC). Illumination at the operative setting was 13000 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.