 |
 |

Fluorouracil and Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage-Reply
Ronald E. P. Frenkel, MD;
Dong H. Shin, MD, PhD
Detroit
Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(2):169.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply.
—We have characterized delayed nonexpulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage (DNSH) as a complication that is most likely to occur when several predisposing factors act in concert.1 We did not suggest that fluorouracil is a factor sufficient by itself or necessary but suspected it to be only one of many possible factors predisposing or contributing to DNSH.
We have no evidence to believe that this drug exerts direct toxic vascular effect causing DNSH. Rather, we think that by inhibiting fibroblastic activity it interferes with wound healing, and when combined with antifibroblastic and anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids and excessive filtration, with or without conjunctival wound leak, may result in prolonged hypotony and serous choroidal detachment, thereby increasing the chance of DNSH when other predisposing factors coexist. Ruderman et al2 similarly mentioned this phenomenon. If fluorouracil had not been used, would all eight patients of Gressel et al3 still have
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|