You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEWS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Automated Visual Field Testing

by David E. Silverstone and Joy Hirsh, 308 pp, 176 illus, East Norwalk, Conn, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1986, $45.

Don C. Bienfang, MD, Reviewer
Boston

Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(10):1333.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I found the first half of this book to be a thorough and useful review of the mathematics and physics of automated visual field testing. The quantitation of what has been largely subjective requires some new understanding for the user. This understanding demands an appreciation of statistical issues that many of us have not used regularly. Automated Visual Field Testing fills this need nicely and for that purpose I would recommend it.

"... the first half... a thorough and useful review..."

About midway in the book the authors begin to discuss clinical entities and gradually seem to lose their way. I can appreciate the middle section, which deals with the important quantitative aspects of following glaucoma fields, but it seems that most of the pages are only reproductions of visual fields. The principles the authors are trying to transmit to the reader probably could have been stated in print rather than . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.