You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDITORIALS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Current Status of Automated Perimetry

Is the Ideal Automated Perimeter Available?

John L. Keltner, MD; Chris A. Johnson, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(3):347-349.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting in 1978, we presented a set of goals for future development in automated perimetry.1 The following are those goals with a few revisions:

  1. Precise detection and assessment of all forms of visual field loss in conjunction with a clinically acceptable false-positive rate.
  2. Accurate monitoring of progressive visual field loss.
  3. Standardization of stimulus conditions for various test procedures with easily interpreted data representation.
  4. Electronic monitoring of eye movements.
  5. Reduction in examination time.
  6. Administration of testing procedures by individuals with little or no perimetric training.
  7. A reliable machine at a reasonable purchase price.

See also pp 339, 395 and 398.

It has been about seven years since these goals were presented, and automated perimetry has undergone tremendous growth during that time. Has the automated perimetry industry successfully achieved these goals? In this editorial, we will briefly review the progress of automated perimetry for each . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Davis, Calif



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.