You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 9, September 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measuring Visual Acuity

Ahmad M. Mansour, MD; Joseph B. Walsh, MD
New York

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(9):1282.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Visual acuity measurement is the most important single test used in ophthalmology. A large variety of visual acuity charts are available, differing in the language, choice of letters, or geometric shapes. With the development of the International Chart in 1909 and the multiple revisions by the International Council of Ophthalmology,1 the luminosity, contrast, distance, and surroundings have been set into what is known as the standard chart (Snellen's chart). Despite all these measures, visual acuity measurement may vary depending on the patient's variables (dry or tearing eyes, diurnal variation in some diabetic patients, previous state of dark adaptation, general alertness and cooperation, and previous memorization of the chart) and on the examiner's variables (patience, interpretation when a patient gives different answers to the same line, and scoring). We noticed a large variation between different examiners' recordings of visual acuity, during the same visit or on follow-up, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.