You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEWS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computerized Visual Fields: What They Are and How to Use Them

by William R. Whalen and George L. Spaeth, 414 pp, with illus, Thorofare, NJ, Slack Inc, 1984, $75.

Claudia U. Richter, MD, Reviewer
Boston

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(7):903.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Computerized perimetry and its clinical applications are clearly and thoroughly described in this excellent textbook. The numerous types of computerized perimeters available and the increasing numbers of instruments in use make it timely and valuable. The Octopus perimeter is the only instrument described, although the basic principles apply to others.

The book is divided into two sections. The first section describes the technology of computerized perimetry—the testing technique, fluctuations in testing, the reliability parameters, and the basic and advanced

"The authors describe the advantages and limitations of each program type and describe clinical situations in which each would be suitable."

software examination programs. Clinicians will find the discussions of nonquantitative screening programs, screening-with-quantitation programs, full quantitation programs, and statistical analyses especially valuable. The authors describe the advantages and limitations of each program type and describe clinical situations in which each would be suitable. The printout types are described in detail. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.