This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Classification of Refractive Corneal Surgery

George O. Waring III, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(10):1472-1477.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Most specialized fields develop their own technical terminology and jargon. Corneal surgery is no exception. The penchant for professional shorthand has produced jargon such as "keratorefractive" surgery, a Greek-Latin hybrid that flows easily from the tongue and pen of those enamored by neologisms. Some surgeons have become "keratotomists," and their patients are "keratotomized." Words have been invented, such as lenticle, instead of the correct term, lenticule—the piece of tissue or synthetic material used to change corneal shape. Commercial trademarked terms have appeared; the donor lenticule used in epikeratoplasty has been dubbed Kerato-Lens. Eponyms abound. Common use of some colloquial terms has fixed them in our vocabulary. For example, some say "myopic keratomileusis" (Is the keratomileusis myopic?), instead of the more precise designation, keratomileusis for myopia. Thus far we have been spared "myopic radial keratotomy."

To clarify the language we use in this rapidly changing area of ophthalmology, I propose . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Atlanta

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?