You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 103 No. 1, January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Extended-Wear Soft Contact Lenses

Walter J. Stark, MD; Neil F. Martin, MD; Gregory Kracher, OD; A. Edward Maumenee, MD
Baltimore

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(1):16.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—We are concerned about the implications of the article by Spoor et al1 in the September issue of the ARCHIVES. The authors have mistakenly referred to our previous publications2,3 as "Reports of successful, complication-free fitting of continuous-wear soft contact lenses... for aphakic correction." They went on to imply that our reports cited an incidence rate of no significant ocular complications.

Unfortunately, the patients in the series described by Spoor et al had a high rate of complications. The patients were treated by resident surgeons and were presumably followed up in a resident clinic. The article indicated that their patients had no clinically important external ocular disease before contact lens fitting, but three patients had severe corneal problems from "dry eye, keratoconjunctivitis, and excessive pannus formation." Four other discontinued patients were "chronic alcoholics and also unreliable."

In contrast, our patients were selected to be reliable and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.