You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 102 No. 9, September 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intravitreal Moxalactam-Reply

Marc O. Yoshizumi, MD
Los Angeles

Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(9):1268.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—We agree with the findings of Leeds et al regarding the safe dose of intravitreal moxalactam. The importance of using moxalactam in a specific, localized intravitreal injection has been recently underscored by the reports of bleeding complications in some patients who have received systemic moxalactam.1,2 Moxalactam and preprothrombin share a structural similarity. This structural similarity may cause inhibition of prothrombin formation. Another theory of moxalactam-related bleeding may be that the intestinal flora is destroyed by the antibiotic, resulting in a deficiency of vitamin K—dependent clotting factors. Moxalactam may further prolong bleeding time by interfering with platelet aggregation. We have not found hemorrhaging to be a problem when moxalactam was administered intravitreally. This is most probably due to the very small doses used in a localized area.

The advantage of moxalactam is its broad spectrum, which includes both staphylococci, as pointed out by Leeds et al, but, even . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.