This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Andrew J. Packer, MD; Thomas A. Weingeist, MD
Iowa City

Gary W. Abrams, MD
Milwaukee

Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(7):970.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The February ARCHIVES contained a fine article by Ho and Tolentino¹ describing the dismal results following treatment of endophthalmitis after vitrectomy. We certainly agree with the authors' conclusion that the poor outcome seems to result from difficulty in diagnosing the condition in its early stages.

We recently reported retinal periphlebitis as an early fundus sign of endophthalmitis.² (Our article was published after the Ho and Tolentino article was submitted.) This finding helped us to recognize endophthalmitis early in several clinical cases. One of our patients had a staphylococcal endophthalmitis following vitrectomy. Prompt treatment of the endophthalmitis led to visual recovery of 20/50. To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of endophthalmitis after vitrectomy with a good visual outcome.

We certainly agree with Ho and Tolentino in emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis of endophthalmitis. Retinal periphlebitis is one additional clue that can help . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?