This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

RALPH F. SHROPSHIRE

Arch Ophthal. 1933;10(4):498-507.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In connection with a series of studies carried out under the direction of Dr. Emeline Moore of the Conservation Department of the State of New York, the eyes of a number of trout were studied, and some of the results of these studies are presented at this time both as a contribution to the comparative anatomy of the eye and as an introduction to further researches, which it is hoped will be completed soon and which have a definite bearing on human ophthalmology.

From time to time, papers have appeared on the comparative anatomy of the eye, and although the many marked anatomic differences between the eyes of fishes and of mammals have been casually noted, no great stress seems to have been laid on them. As would naturally be expected, owing to the environment of fish, their refractive problems are considerably different from those of mammals. Still further, owing . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
BUFFALO

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?