You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 10 No. 3, September 1933 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

OCULAR SYPHILIS

IV. INTERSTITIAL KERATITIS AND TRAUMA; CLINICAL, EXPERIMENTAL AND MEDICOLEGAL ASPECTS

JOSEPH V. KLAUDER, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1933;10(3):302-328.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Although Mackenzie,1 in 1840, clinically described interstitial keratitis under the heading of scrofulous corneitis, it was not until 1885 that Hutchinson2 established with certainty that interstitial keratitis was attributable to congenital syphilis.

Few reports relative to the rôle of trauma in the causation of interstitial keratitis were published prior to 1905, and it was not until Perlia's3 report that the subject received much attention. Since then many reports have appeared—relatively few, however, in the American literature—and much controversy has been waged regarding the rôle of trauma in the causation of interstitial keratitis. The question is of considerable medicolegal importance and is constantly being discussed in the courts of law and before industrial accident boards.

Since it cannot be scientifically proved or disproved that trauma is concerned in the production of interstitial keratitis, any supposed rôle is a presumption. How valid is such presumption . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Professor of Dermatology and Syphilology, Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania ; Dermatologist and Syphilologist to Wills Hospital PHILADELPHIA

From the Wills Hospital Clinic for the Treatment of Ocular Syphilis and the Research Institute of Cutaneous Medicine.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1933 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.