This Article  • PDF of this Correction  • Original article  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Ophthalmology, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:525.

In the study titled "Prevalence and Causes of Visual Field Loss in the Elderly and Associations With Impairment in Daily Functioning," published in the December issue of the ARCHIVES (2001;119:1788-1794), Table 2 had an error in the bottom row. The data are published here in the correct columns. In addition, a correction has been made to the title by adding the term possible. Finally, the term NA was used in the column indicating 0 VF defects per eye; it has been replaced throughout the column by the number 0. Table 2 is reprinted correctly here.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] Table 2. Subdivision, by Number and Type, of Possible Goldmann VF Loss in 739 Eyes From 372 Individuals With Abnormal Suprathreshold Screening Test Results*