You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 9, September 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laser Surgery
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improved Binocularity After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis

Barry N. Wasserman, MD; Chrishonda C. McCoy, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(9):1293-1294.

Refractive surgery can improve uncorrected vision over a wide range of refractive errors. However, impaired binocularity has been reported after refractive surgery.1 Decompensated strabismus and loss of stereopsis can be disturbing, even when visual acuity outcome is excellent. Improved stereopsis after refractive surgery is rarely reported and is usually found in the pediatric population.2 We present a case of improved stereopsis after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment of anisometropia in an adult.

Report of a Case

A 32-year-old woman was first seen for LASIK evaluation, complaining that her eyes did not "work well together." She had been prescribed glasses at age 6 years, but she did not wear them. She denied therapy for amblyopia or strabismus. She had no significant medical history and her medication included only birth control.

Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/150 OD and 20/30 OS. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 OD and 20/20 OS. Cycloplegic refraction was + 2.75 – 4.50 x 116 OD and – 0.75 – 0.25 x 80 OS. Titmus stereoacuity testing without correction yielded 5 of 9 dots (100 seconds of arc). Pupil, extraocular motility, slitlamp, intraocular pressure, and dilated retinal examination results were all normal. No contact lens trial was performed.

The patient underwent LASIK surgery with the Moria CB manual microkeratome (Moria USA, Doylestown, Pennsylvania) and the VISX STAR S4 Laser (VISX USA Inc, Santa Clara, California). At postoperative week 1, the patient stated that her eyes were working better together. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 OD and 20/20 OS. Stereoacuity testing results were now 8 of 9 dots (50 seconds of arc). At 1 month after the operation, the patient felt her depth perception was "perfect." Her vision was unchanged and manifest refraction was plano – 0.50 x 146 OD and plano – 0.25 x 13 OS. Stereoacuity had improved to 9 of 9 dots (40 seconds of arc). At 7 months, she maintained Titmus stereoacuity (40 seconds of arc) and stated that the dots had become even easier to see.


Comment

Refractive surgery effectively improves visual acuity and reduces refractive error. However, it can adversely affect binocular function. Reports describe decompensation of strabismus following refractive surgery, with resultant esotropia, exotropia, or hypertropia.1 The strabismus can lead to asthenopia or even diplopia.3 In cases of monovision refractive surgery, some patients will lose subjective depth perception.4 Stereoacuity may be difficult to recover, even when monovision is reversed with correction.

This case presents improved stereopsis in an adult with long-standing anisometropia. Despite minimal amblyopia in the right eye (best-corrected visual acuity, 20/25), her subjective and objective binocularity improved within 1 week after LASIK. She further improved to 40 seconds of arc at 1 month after the operation, which was maintained at 7 months. She did have some optical correction as a child, which may have yielded her some increased stereoacuity potential. Her preoperative decreased stereoacuity may have been related to her not wearing corrective devices and may have improved with contact lens trial. However, she had a subjective and objective improvement with time after LASIK resolved her anisometropia. In a MEDLINE search, we were unable to find cases in which an adult patient had improved stereoacuity after refractive surgery.

Patients with a history of strabismus or undergoing monovision refractive surgery should be warned of decreased binocularity. However, some patients with anisometropia may experience an improvement in binocularity after refractive surgery.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Wasserman, Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, 840 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (bwasserman{at}americansurgisite.com).

Financial Disclosure: None reported.


REFERENCES

1. Godts D, Tassignon MJ, Gobin L. Binocular visual impairment after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(1):101-109. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
2. Phillips CB, Prager TC, McClellan G, Mintz-Hittner HA. Laser in situ keratomileusis for treated anisometropic amblyopia in awake, autofixating pediatric and adolescent patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(12):2522-2528. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
3. Kushner BJ, Kowal L. Diplopia after refractive surgery: occurrence and prevention. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(3):315-321. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Fawcett SL, Herman WK, Alfieri CD; et al. Stereoacuity and foveal fusion in adults with long-standing surgical monovision. J AAPOS. 2001;5(6):342-347. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED

SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.