You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 1, January 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Ophthalmic Molecular Genetics
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Macular Degeneration
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Complement Factor H Polymorphism p.Tyr402His and Cuticular Drusen

Michael A. Grassi, MD; James C. Folk, MD; Todd E. Scheetz, PhD; Christine M. Taylor, BS; Val C. Sheffield, MD, PhD; Edwin M. Stone, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(1):93-97.

ABSTRACT

Objective  To determine the histidine frequency in patients with the cuticular drusen phenotype of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods  Fifty individuals were identified who met the criteria for the cuticular drusen phenotype using a standard threshold photograph. We genotyped DNA samples using a polymerase chain reaction–based restriction digest assay. Seven hundred individuals with typical AMD and 252 controls were also genotyped. Fisher exact test was used to analyze the significance of allele frequency differences.

Results  The histidine variant was present in 70% (frequency ± SE, 0.70 ± 0.05) of the cuticular cohort, 55% (frequency ± SE, 0.55 ± 0.01) of the more typical AMD cases, and 34% (frequency ± SE, 0.34 ± 0.02) of controls. The association between the cuticular drusen phenotype and the histidine allele was highly significant (P = .003; odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.07; vs AMD cases P<.001; odds ratio 4.54; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-7.50; vs controls). Genotype distribution between the 3 groups was similarly significant (P<.001).

Conclusion  The cuticular drusen phenotype is highly associated with the Tyr402His variant of the complement factor H (CFH) gene. The significantly higher histidine allele frequency in this group compared with the typical AMD cohort suggests that the complement cascade may play a greater role in the pathogenesis of the cuticular drusen subtype than in AMD as a whole.

Clinical Relevance  The c.1204T>C, p.Tyr402His allelic variant in the CFH gene is associated with a 3-fold increased risk for AMD. A high frequency of the histidine allele has also been noted in patients with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of irreversible visual loss in the developed world, affecting more than 10 million people in the United States alone.1 Drusen are the hallmark lesions of AMD. In 1985, Kenyon et al2 described a peculiar fundus pattern characterized biomicroscopically by diffuse, 25- to 75-µm, yellow, circular drusen. These drusen often cluster in groups of 15 to 20, resembling streptococci seen on Gram stain (Figure 1A). Commonly appearing in early adulthood, this phenotype is best appreciated on fluorescein angiography, which reveals a "starry-sky" appearance (Figure 1B).4 Russell and coworkers5 have demonstrated that histopathologically these drusen are indistinguishable from those found in typical AMD.


Figure 1
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Ophthalmoscopic and angiographic features that characterize the cuticular drusen phenotype. A, Thirty-degree color fundus photograph centered on the macula demonstrating classic features of cuticular drusen, including a vitelliform macular detachment.3 B, Negative fluorescein angiogram of the same patient taken at 55.2 seconds revealing multiple pinpoint areas of hyperfluorescence corresponding to drusen in a "starry sky" distribution. Note the fluorescein blockage and associated early leakage due to a drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment. C, Sixty-degree fundus photograph centered on the macula of a patient with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II demonstrating diffuse cuticular drusen. D, Threshold photograph used for grading the cuticular drusen phenotype. Classification required the presence of cuticular drusen on fluorescein angiography of equal or greater number and extent than that visualized in this frame.


Patients with a specific form of autoimmune renal disease, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (MPGN II), develop cuticular drusen.4, 6-14 The fundus features of this condition develop at a young age in individuals with MPGN II and are commonly present by the second decade of life (Figure 1C). Variants in the complement factor H gene (CFH) (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, [OMIM] #134370) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of MPGN II in both animal models as well as in humans.15-18

A number of studies have recently identified an association between AMD and the c.1204T>C, p.Tyr402His allelic variant in the CFH gene.18-21 In Caucasian patients with AMD, a histidine allele is present in approximately 55% of individuals and confers a 3-fold increased risk for AMD (odds ratio, 2.45-4.6). Individuals with MPGN II have a 70% frequency of the histidine variant.18 We assembled a group of patients with the cuticular drusen phenotype and hypothesized that the frequency of the histidine allele in this population might be similarly increased when compared with a cohort of AMD patients and controls.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PATIENTS

The recruitment and research protocols were reviewed and approved by the University of Iowa institutional review board. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All patients were examined by an ophthalmologist and were found to have signs consistent with the clinical diagnosis of AMD. Only those individuals with normal examination findings were enrolled as controls. All patients were ascertained from the University of Iowa's Department of Ophthalmology. The AMD patients and controls were all more than 50 years old (average age of controls, 75.5 years). Only Caucasian individuals were enrolled in this study. All participants were ascertained during the same period by the same clinic.

Two of us (M.A.G. and J.C.F.) assigned individuals to the cuticular drusen cohort. Both reviewers independently graded the ophthalmoscopic images of more than 1000 individuals with AMD to identify patients who exceeded the threshold for the cuticular drusen phenotype as defined by a standard photo (Figure 1D). Irreconcilable disagreement between the 2 graders disqualified the patient from inclusion in the study. The reviewers were masked for patient genotype. Inclusion criteria included the presence of all of the following: diffuse small, circular, uniform drusen distributed throughout the macula extending to the arcades of greater number and extent than that visualized in Figure 1D; characteristic clustering or clumping of the drusen into groups of 15 to 203; and early hyperfluorescence of drusen on fluorescein angiography with greater than one half the fundus area revealing pinpoint hyperfluorescence. Fundus photos were also analyzed for the presence of geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization.

GENOTYPING

We extracted DNA from peripheral blood according to a previously described protocol.22 We used 12.5 ng of each patient's DNA as template in a 8.35-µL polymerase chain reaction containing 1.25 µL 10X buffer (100 mM Tris–hydrochloric acid, pH 8.3; 500 mM potassium chloride; 15 mM magnesium chloride); 300 µM each of dCTP, dATP, dGTP, and dTTP; 1 pmol of each primer; and 0.25 units of polymerase (Biolase, Irvine, Calif). Samples were denatured for 5 minutes at 94°C and incubated for 35 cycles under the following conditions: 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds in a Peltier DNA thermocycler (PTC-225; MJ Research, Johannesburg, South Africa). Primers were generated based on the GenBank sequence of the CFH gene (NM_000186.2):

F: 5' TCATTGTTATGGTCCTTAGGAAA 3'

R: 5' ACTGTGGTCTGCGCTTTTG 3'

We added restriction endonuclease N1aIII (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Mass) to the polymerase chain reaction products in the following reaction per well: 1.2 µL 10X bovine serum albumin, 1.2 µL NEBuffer 4 (New England Biolabs), 0.2 µL NlaIII (10 000 U/mL), and 1.05 µL nuclease-free water. The samples were incubated at 37° for 2 hours in a DNA thermocycler (Omnigene; Hybaid, Middlesex, England). After digestion, 5 µL of stop solution (95% formamide, 10 mM sodium hydroxide, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 0.05% xylene cyanol) was added to each sample. Digested amplification products underwent electrophoreses on 2% agarose E-Gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif). All gels were stained with ethidium bromide for 15 minutes in the Invitrogen E-Gel Powerbase version 4, and the presence of the CFH C allele was determined by inspection of the restriction pattern (Figure 2). Genotype correlation with the restriction pattern was confirmed in a small subset of subjects by automated sequencing.


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Photomicrograph of 2% agarose E-Gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) demonstrating banding pattern produced by N1aIII restriction digestion of the complement factor H gene (CFH ) c.1204T>C, p.Tyr402His variant. CC indicates homozygous cytosine genotype; CT, heterozygous genotype composed of a cytosine allele and a thymine allele; TT, homozygous thymine genotype.


STATISTICS

Standard error for allele and genotype frequency was calculated using the formula:

SE = {surd}[p(1-p)/n]

where p is the frequency, and n is the total number of alleles for allele frequency or the total number of individuals for genotype frequency. Significance of the genotype and allele frequencies was analyzed between the groups using a 2-tailed Fisher exact test.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

CONTROLS

The prevalence of the histidine alteration was assessed in 252 unrelated subjects at the University of Iowa. The frequency of the risk allele in the University of Iowa control cohort is 34% (frequency ± SE, 0.34 ± 0.02) (Table 1). The prevalence of the histidine allele ranges from 34% to 39% in the Caucasian population unaffected by AMD.18-21


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 1. Comparison of Genotype and Allele Frequencies


AMD CASES

We analyzed 700 unrelated individuals with AMD for the presence of the histidine allele at the Tyr402His locus. Risk allele frequency in the Iowa AMD cohort is 55% (frequency ± SE, 0.55 ± 0.01) (Table 1), which corresponds well with prior studies where the reported frequency ranged from approximately 46% to 59%.18-21

CUTICULAR CASES

Fifty individuals met the criteria for inclusion into the cuticular drusen cohort. The histidine allele frequency in this population is 70% (frequency ± SE, 0.70 ± 0.05) (Table 1), which closely approximates the prevalence reported in patients with MPGN II.18 When the risk allele frequency in this group is compared with that observed in controls, a statistically significant difference is appreciated (P<.001; odds ratio, 4.54; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-7.50). Moreover, when allele frequencies are compared with the AMD cohort, this trend remains significant (P = .003; odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.07). Genotype frequencies between the groups were also analyzed and found to be similarly significant (P<.001).

Clinical characteristics of the cuticular cohort are shown in Table 2. Sixty percent of the group was composed of women, and the mean age at presentation was 62.7 years (range, 34-98 years). Natural history was assessed by evaluating the rate of choroidal neovascularization (21%; 21/100 eyes); geographic atrophy (11%; 11/100 eyes); and vision in the better eye equal to or worse than 20/100 (22%; 11/50 patients).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of the Cuticular Drusen Cohort



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The cuticular drusen phenotype has been given many different names. Initially called diffuse drusen,2 it was later termed cuticular drusen followed by basal laminar drusen4 and more recently early adult onset grouped drusen.23 Because of its striking ophthalmoscopic and angiographic appearance as well as an earlier age at onset, this phenotype appears to be a distinct clinical entity within the heterogenous spectrum of fundus findings that compose AMD.

There are at least 2 reasons that this phenotype is worthy of study from a genetic perspective. First, since the location and composition of cuticular drusen are identical to that found in AMD, it is likely that these 2 conditions share a common mechanism of drusen biogenesis.5 Second, the characteristic early onset of this disorder suggests that there may be a greater genetic predisposition to this phenotype than AMD in general. Almost half of the patients in our cuticular cohort had a positive family history of AMD. In addition, individuals with the cuticular phenotype demonstrate a 2-times greater frequency of the histidine allele (c.1204T>C, p.Tyr402His of the CFH gene) than patients with typical AMD. It is notable that cuticular drusen are also present in patients with AMD who harbor missense changes in the fibulin 5 gene (FBLN5) (OMIM #604580).24-25

Of the 50 individuals identified with the cuticular phenotype, 5 were homozygous for the protective tyrosine allele. To determine whether these patients were outliers, the clinical data for these patients were reviewed following unmasking of the graders. We sought to determine whether these patients were significantly older than those found in the remainder of the cuticular cohort. In addition, fundus photos for these patients were reanalyzed to whether there was a discernable ophthalmoscopic difference in the appearance of these patients. We speculated that on the phenotypic spectrum of cuticular drusen, these patients might be clustered to the left near the standard threshold image (Figure 1D). We found no difference in the age distribution of these patients. Moreover, of the 5 patients, 3 were considered to have classic, exemplary features of the phenotype that far exceeded the threshold criteria.

It has been suggested that the natural history associated with this phenotype may be better than that of AMD as a whole.3 In our study, the prevalence of choroidal neovascularization was lower in the cuticular cohort compared with the overall rate in the AMD population (0.21 vs 0.40, respectively) (Table 2).24, 26 The lower rate of choroidal neovascularization in the cuticular cohort may simply reflect a bias of ascertainment as the phenotype may be partially masked in those individuals harboring large disciform scars. Moreover, our data suggest that the course of cuticular patients is not benign with more than 1 in 5 patients developing vision of 20/100 or worse in their better eye.

In summary, our findings clearly implicate the CFH gene as an important determinant of expression of the cuticular drusen phenotype. To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of patients with cuticular drusen reported to date. These data support the observation that cuticular drusen is a unique and identifiable phenotype within the spectrum of AMD.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Edwin M. Stone, MD, PhD, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 (edwin-stone{at}uiowa.edu).

Submitted for Publication: June 1, 2006; final revision received August 7, 2006; accepted August 8, 2006.

Author Contribution: Dr Grassi had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Foundation Fighting Blindness, the Carver Endowment for Molecular Ophthalmology, the Grousbeck Family Foundation, the Macula Vision Research Foundation, the Heed Ophthalmic Foundation, the Robert C. Watzke Vitreoretinal Research Fund, Research to Prevent Blindness Inc, and grant EY016822 from the National Institutes of Health. Drs Stone and Sheffield are investigators of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Dr Grassi was a Heed Fellow in 2005. Dr Scheetz is a recipient of a Career Development Award from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc.

Acknowledgment: We are indebted to the subjects and their families for their participation in the study; to Drs John Fingert, Jian Huang, and Robert Mullins for their many helpful discussions; to Drs Stephen Russell and Culver Boldt for assistance in recruiting subjects; and to Linda Koser, Dianna Brack, Ed Heffron, and Renai Ray for their technical assistance.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Drs Grassi, Folk, Scheetz, Sheffield, and Stone and Ms Taylor) and Pediatrics (Dr Sheffield), Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City; Heed Ophthalmic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Grassi); Center for Bio-informatics and Computational Biology, Iowa City (Drs Scheetz, Sheffield, and Stone); Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Md (Drs Sheffield and Stone); and Carver Family Center for Macular Degeneration, Iowa City (Drs Folk, Scheetz, Sheffield, and Stone).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Munoz B; et al, Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:564-572. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Kenyon KR, Maumenee AE, Ryan SJ, Whitmore PV, Green WR. Diffuse drusen and associated complications. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:119-128. ISI | PUBMED
3. Gass JD, Jallow S, Davis B. Adult vitelliform macular detachment occurring in patients with basal laminar drusen. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:445-459. ISI | PUBMED
4. Gass JDM. Basal Laminar Drusen and Macular Degeneration: Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases Diagnosis and Treatment. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby;1997:106-111.
5. Russell SR, Mullins RF, Schneider BL, Hageman GS. Location, substructure, and composition of basal laminar drusen compared with drusen associated with aging and age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:205-214. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
6. Leys A, Proesmans W, Van Damme-Lombaerts R, Van Damme B. Specific eye fundus lesions in type II membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis [erratum appears in Pediatr Nephrol 1991 May;5:364]. Pediatr Nephrol. 1991;5:189-192. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
7. Leys A, Vanrenterghem Y, Van Damme B, Snyers B, Pirson Y, Leys M. Fundus changes in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II: a fluorescein angiographic study of 23 patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:406-410. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
8. Leys A, Van Damme B, Verberckmoes R. Ocular complications of type 2 membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:211-214. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Leys A, Vanrenterghem Y, Van Damme B, Snyers B, Pirson Y, Leys M. Sequential observation of fundus changes in patients with long standing membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II (MPGN type II). Eur J Ophthalmol. 1991;1:17-22. PUBMED
10. Michielsen B, Leys A, Van Damme B, Missotten L. Fundus changes in chronic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990;76:219-229. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
11. Leys A, Michielsen B, Leys M, Vanrenterghem Y, Missotten L, Van Damme B. Subretinal neovascular membranes associated with chronic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228:499-504. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
12. O’Brien C, Duvall-Young J, Brown M, Short C, Bone M. Electrophysiology of type II mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis with associated fundus abnormalities. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:778-780. FREE FULL TEXT
13. McAvoy CE, Silvestri G. Retinal changes associated with type 2 glomerulonephritis. Eye. 2005;19:985-989. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
14. Mullins RF, Aptsiauri N, Hageman GS. Structure and composition of drusen associated with glomerulonephritis: implications for the role of complement activation in drusen biogenesis. Eye. 2001;15:390-395. ISI | PUBMED
15. Hogasen K, Jansen JH, Mollnes TE, Hovdenes J, Harboe M. Hereditary porcine membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II is caused by factor H deficiency. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1054-1061. ISI | PUBMED
16. Levy M, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L, Gubler MC; et al. H deficiency in two brothers with atypical dense intramembranous deposit disease. Kidney Int. 1986;30:949-956. ISI | PUBMED
17. Pickering MC, Cook HT, Warren J; et al. Uncontrolled C3 activation causes membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in mice deficient in complement factor H. Nat Genet. 2002;31:424-428. ISI | PUBMED
18. Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV; et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7227-7232. FREE FULL TEXT
19. Edwards AO, Ritter IIIR, Abel KJ, Manning A, Panhuysen C, Farrer LA. Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:421-424. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S; et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:419-421. FREE FULL TEXT
21. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY; et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:385-389. FREE FULL TEXT
22. Buffone GJ, Darlington GJ. Isolation of DNA from biological specimens without extraction with phenol. Clin Chem. 1985;31:164-165. FREE FULL TEXT
23. Russell SR, Gupta RR, Folk JC, Mullins RF, Hageman GS. Comparison of color to fluorescein angiographic images from patients with early-adult onset grouped drusen suggests drusen substructure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:924-930. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
24. Stone EM, Braun TA, Russell SR; et al. Missense variations in the fibulin 5 gene and age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:346-353. FREE FULL TEXT
25. Lotery AJ, Baas D, Ridley C; et al. Reduced secretion of fibulin 5 in age-related macular degeneration and cutis laxa. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:568-574. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
26. Cohen SY, Meunier I, Soubrane G, Glacet-Bernard A, Coscas GJ. Visual function and course of basal laminar drusen combined with vitelliform macular detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:437-440. FREE FULL TEXT

SECTION EDITOR: JANEY L. WIGGS, MD, PhD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Genotype-phenotype correlation of age-related macular degeneration: influence of complement factor H polymorphism
Droz et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:513-517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.