You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laser Surgery
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Myopic Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Following Epikeratophakia

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:269-270.

A 48-year-old healthy white man underwent bilateral epikeratophakia in 1986 for high myopia. After several months, his refraction regressed slightly and his right cornea developed central haze. He then had photorefractive keratectomy in both eyes for myopia and phototherapeutic keratectomy in the right eye to reduce the corneal haze, which was not successful. Therefore, in March of 1999, the epikeratophakia lenticle was removed from the right cornea to reduce the central corneal haze.

The patient was initially seen in June 2002 for a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) consult. At that time, the patient’s uncorrected vision was counting fingers OU. Best-corrected vision in the right eye was 20/20 – 1 with a dry refraction of –7.25 – 2.50 x 180 and 20/20 with a cycloplegic refraction of –7.00 – 1.00 x 180; in the left eye, it was 20/30 + 2 with a dry refraction of –8.50 – 2. 00 x 165 and 20/30 + 2 with a cycloplegic refraction of –8.00 – 2.00 x 165. Pachymetry was 527 µm OD and 672 µm OS. Keratometry was 42.50 diopters (D) at 15 degrees, 44.00 D at 105 degrees OD and 43.75 D at 10 degrees, 45.50 D at 100 degrees OS. Anterior and posterior segment examination results were normal except for corneal neovascularization superiorly and inferiorly in both eyes and midperipheral anterior stromal scarring from the 2-o’clock to the 10-o’clock position in both eyes. Centrally the cornea was clear in both eyes (Figure 1). Corneal topography of the left eye showed a circular midperipheral steepening from the lenticle still present within the cornea (Figure 2).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. External photographs of the right eye (left) and the left eye (right) showing corneal neovascularization and midperipheral stromal scarring.




View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Corneal topographies of both eyes after epikeratophakia (the lenticle has been removed from the right eye) and prior to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.


After much counseling, the patient decided to proceed. On July 11, 2002, LASIK was performed on the left eye. The VISX Star 3 excimer laser (VISX Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) and Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) were used. After the flap had been made and lifted in the left eye, a raised ridge of corneal tissue was visible in the midperiphery of the stromal bed. This midperipheral thickening and elevated corneal tissue was presumed to be the previously placed lenticle. The left eye was treated for –7.3 – 2.00 x 165. One day postoperatively, uncorrected vision was 20/100 OS. The flap was in good position and clear except for the preexisting stromal scarring. One week postoperatively, the patient’s uncorrected vision was 20/50 OS. The left eye was correctable to 20/20 with +1.50 – 1.75 x 60.

The patient was followed up every 2 weeks for 5 months until his vision and refraction stabilized in the left eye (without correction, visual acuity was 20/200 and with correction, –1.75 – 2.50 x 45, visual acuity was 20/20). Keratometry in the left eye at this time was 41.25 D at 136 degrees, 38.75 D at 46 degrees, and pachymetry in the left eye was 572 µm. The topography of the left eye just prior to the enhancement is shown (Figure 3). The left eye was retreated on January 15, 2003, for –1.8 – 2.50 x 45. The flap was not recut but lifted up with some difficulty, as it had adhered very strongly to the corneal bed. At 1 day postoperatively, the uncorrected vision was 20/20 OS.



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Corneal topography of the left eye after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and prior to enhancement.


The final uncorrected distance vision, 3 months after retreatment, was 20/20 – 1 OS. Uncorrected near vision was Jaeger measure 2 OS. The patient was very happy with his final visual outcome.

This is the first known case of LASIK for myopia being performed after epikeratophakia. This report shows that LASIK following epikeratophakia can be performed successfully.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Conti, 121 Rte 31, Suite 200, Flemington, NJ 08822 (contieyecare{at}aol.com).

Eileen Conti, MD

SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.