You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 9, September 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmological Disorders, Other
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •General Rhinology
 •Paranasal Sinus Disease
 •Immunology
 •Allergy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Allergic Fungal Sinusitis With Unilateral Eye Involvement

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1390-1393.

We describe 2 patients with ocular signs and symptoms who were subsequently diagnosed as having allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS). This disease is characterized primarily by chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, allergic mucin, and the presence of fungal organisms according to a culture and/or histologic examination.1 Clinical features are those associated with chronic rhinosinusitis, which include facial pressure, nasal obstruction, and rhinorrhea.2 Proptosis, ptosis, and diplopia are the most common ocular symptoms; however, these conditions rarely represent the initial manifestation of the disease. The nasal mucus specimens of patients with AFS are designated as allergic mucin because of the abundance of eosinophils and their degradation products within the mucus.1 Although standardized treatment for AFS is not well defined, surgical debridement and systemic corticosteroid therapy are commonly recommended.

The typical patient with AFS is young and immunocompetent with a history of asthma or atopy.2 Orbital involvement in AFS is caused by the direct extension of sinus inflammation and can result in compressive ocular symptoms. Although well described in the medical literature, AFS has rarely been described with ophthalmic involvement. We found only 5 such patients discussed in the ophthalmologic literature and take this opportunity to add our case series to this list.2-5

Report of Cases

Case 1. A 15-year-old African American boy came to our clinic with mild proptosis, pain and tearing of the left eye, and a history of having been "elbowed" in that eye 4 months previously (Figure 1). Medications included ibuprofen, fexofenadine hydrochloride, and an artificial tear preparation. Medical and family histories were noncontributory. His visual acuity was 20/20 OU. Slight hypoglobus and 5-mm proptosis were present in the left eye. The remainder of the ocular examination results were unremarkable. An otolaryngologic consultation provided findings of erythematous nares, congestion, a deviated nasal septum, and polyps in the left nasal cavity. An orbital computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed extensive sinus soft tissue opacification with sinus expansion and multifocal erosion with lytic destruction of bone along the paranasal sinuses. In addition, a left frontal sinus soft tissue abnormality was noted extending into the left anterior cranial fossa and superior left orbit (Figure 2). Initial treatment included a daily nasal preparation with fluticasone propionate and a methylprednisolone taper.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. A 15-year-old African American boy with proptosis, hypoglobus, and mild blepharoptosis of the left eye.




View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Coronal computed tomographic scan reveals opacification of the frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses with extension to the left anterior cranial fossa and superior left orbit, clearly invading the left cranial fossa and superior orbit as an expansive process.


Endoscopic sinus surgery included left polypectomy, ethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, frontal sinus trephination, and right frontal sinus exploration. The operation revealed thick, "claylike" fungal material and thick mucinous secretions throughout the sinuses. The sinus contents were removed and submitted for histologic examination. The patient was instructed to self-administer saline irrigation with a bulb syringe and to continue taking fluticasone. A 1-month postoperative evaluation showed resolution of periocular edema with a return of facial symmetry.

Histologic specimens revealed polypoid fragments of respiratory mucosa and bone admixed with sheets of hyaline eosinophilic material containing numerous cellular aggregates. The respiratory mucosa was largely denuded of epithelium, and the stroma was edematous and contained a chronic inflammatory infiltrate composed predominantly of lymphocytes and plasma cells but also with patchy aggregates of eosinophils. The cellular aggregates within the mucus were composed almost entirely of intact and degranulated eosinophils. Charcot-Leyden crystals were abundant (Figure 3). Fungal elements were not visible on a routine hematoxylin-eosin stain, but numerous branching septate hyphae with degenerative features were identified within the mucus on a Gomori methenamine silver stain (Figure 4). No invasive fungal elements were noted. Microbiological cultures of the specimens were not performed.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Case 1. Eosinophilic mucoid material contains clusters of eosinophils and associated Charcot-Leyden crystals (arrowheads) (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification x400).




View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Case 1. Degenerated branching septate fungal hyphae are present within the mucus (Gomori methenamine silver; original magnification x400).


Case 2. A 22-year-old man came to our otolaryngology clinic with a 2-year history of progressive symptoms of left eye fullness and nasal airway obstruction. His medical history was significant for mild asthma, nasal airway obstruction, and nasal polyps requiring multiple endoscopic sinus operations since age 17 years. No double vision or other visual abnormalities were noted. Medication consisted of an over-the-counter inhaler. An examination revealed mild left proptosis and slight hypoglobus. An intranasal examination revealed polyps filling both nasal cavities with extension into the nasal vestibule. The remaining physical examination findings were normal. A coronal CT scan of the head, without contrast, revealed extensive sinusitis with soft tissue densities of the frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses (Figure 5). The medial walls of the maxillary antra were obscured, and involvement of the sphenoid sinuses was also noted. Focal areas within the soft tissue densities suggested the possibility of fungal disease. The patient was given 40 mg/d of prednisone for 5 days prior to endoscopic sinus surgery.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Coronal view soft tissue window of an expansive/destructive process originating from pansinusitis and causing secondary ptosis and hypoglobus.


Surgery consisted of bilateral maxillary antrostomy, bilateral total ethmoidectomy, and left frontal sinus trephination. The operation revealed thick, "claylike" fungal material and edematous polypoid mucosa. The sinus mucosa and its contents were submitted for pathologic examination. The patient was instructed to self-administer saline irrigation using a bulb syringe. Three weeks postoperatively, he noted a resolution of discharge and facial pressure symptoms. An endoscopic evaluation showed mild residual sinus edema, and treatment was instituted with a regimen of oral corticosteroids for 10 days.

The results of histopathologic examination of the sinus contents and excised mucosa were identical to those in case 1; namely, edematous respiratory mucosa and mucoid sinus contents, both containing numerous eosinophils, and fungal hyphae within the sinus contents on a Gomori methenamine silver stain (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Microbiological cultures were not performed.



View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 6. Case 2. Edematous polypoid respiratory mucosa (bottom) and eosinophilic intraluminal mucoid material (top) comprise the pathologic specimen (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification x100).




View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 7. Case 2. Eosinophils predominate in the lamina propria of the respiratory mucosa (hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification x200).



Comment

Allergic fungal sinusitis was originally described by A. L. Katzenstein in 1983 and was categorized as allergic Aspergillus sinusitis.1 The dermatiaceous family of fungi has been recognized as the most common etiology of AFS.6 This family includes Bipolaris species, Curvularia lunata, and Alternaria species.5 The mucus specimens of patients with AFS are designated as allergic mucosa owing to the marked presence of eosinophils and their degradation products, which include Charcot-Leyden crystals and a major basic protein. The hypothesized pathophysiologic mechanism of AFS is the presence of an eosinophilic reaction to fungal exposure of the sinuses.1 Elevated IgE levels have been noted in less than 33% of patients with AFS.

Allergic fungal sinusitis has occurred in patients ranging from age 8 to 56 years with a mean age of 26 years.2 This disease often occurs in patients with a marked allergic diathesis such as atopy and the presence of nasal polyps.3 Blunt trauma has been identified as an inciting factor for AFS.5 A recent study identified AFS in 93% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, suggesting that the disease may be more prevalent than originally estimated.1

Clinical features are those associated with chronic rhinosinusitis, which include facial pressure, nasal obstruction, and rhinorrhea.2 Proptosis, ptosis, and diplopia are the most common ocular symptoms; however, these seem to occur late and rarely represent the initial manifestation of the disease.2, 5 Epiphora has been noted, and loss of vision is rare.2

Diagnosis of AFS is made primarily with a combination of characteristic findings on a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that correlate with the presence of allergic mucin and positive fungi according to a culture or histologic examination. Classic sinus CT scan findings in AFS include central areas of hyperattenuation that correspond to a hypointense signal on T1-weighted MRI and a signal void with T2-weighted MRI. Sinus expansion and bony erosion with evidence of remodeling have also been reported.7 Results of fungal cultures are often negative and may be due to sampling difficulty.

Although no standard treatment for AFS has been defined, surgical debridement and systemic corticosteroid therapy are commonly recommended. Fungal desensitization with immunotherapy injection is finding an increasing role in the treatment of this disease.8 Corticosteroid therapy is based on similarities between the pathophysiologic mechanisms of AFS and those of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.5 Antifungal agents generally are not recommended, even in cases with intracranial extension.6

This study was supported in part by unrestricted grants from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY, and the Pat and Willard Walker Eye Research Center, Little Rock, Ark.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

Blake N. Geren, BS; Harry H. Brown, MD; H. Graves Hearnsberger III, MD; Christopher T. Westfall, MD

Correspondence: Dr Westfall, Department of Ophthalmology, Mail Slot 523, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 (westfallchristophert{at}uams.edu).


REFERENCES

1. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, et al. The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:877-884. ABSTRACT
2. Chang WJ, Shields CL, Shields JA, et al. Bilateral orbital involvement with massive allergic fungal sinusitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:767-768.
3. DeJuan E, Green WR, Iliff NT. Allergic periorbital mucopyocele in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:299-303. ISI | PUBMED
4. Dunlop IS, Billson FA. Visual failure in allergic Aspergillus sinusitis: case report. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;72:127-130. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Jacobson M, Galetta SL, Atlas SW, Curtis MT, Wulc AW. Bipolaris-induced orbital cellulitis. J Clin Neuro Ophthalmol. 1992;12:250-256. PUBMED
6. Manning SC, Schaefer SD, Close LG, Vuitch F. Culture-positive allergic fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:174-178. FREE FULL TEXT
7. Manning SC, Merkel M, Kriesel K, Vuitch F, Marple B. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:170-176. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
8. Folker RJ, Marple BF, Mabry RL, Mabry CS. Treatment of allergic fungal sinusitis: a comparison trial of postoperative immunotherapy with specific fungal antigens. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1623-1627. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED

SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Allergic Fungal Sinusitis With Subperiosteal Orbital Abscess
Meyer and Nagi
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1281-1282.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.