You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 8, August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •Extract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •External Eye Disease
 •Rheumatology
 •Rheumatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Gouty Tophus at the Lateral Canthus

Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1195-1197.

Gout is a group of diseases characterized by hyperuricemia that leads to deposition of urate crystals in many tissues of the body, including the joints, skin, bursae, periarticular ligaments, and kidneys.1 One distinctive pathological finding in patients with gout is the tophus, a deposition surrounded by inflammation.1 Tophi rarely involve the face. We found only 2 reports of a gouty tophus on the face, one on the upper eyelid near the lateral canthus2 and the other on the bridge of the nose.3 We present the clinical and histopathological findings in a patient with what, we believe, is only the second reported case of a gouty tophus adjacent to the eye.

Report of a Case

A 44-year-old man was referred for evaluation of a painless mass near the lateral canthus of the right eye (Figure 1) that had been present and gradually enlarging for approximately 1 year. The lesion had not bled, and there had been no discharge. The patient had a history of gout and arthritis, and the joints of his feet and wrists were swollen. Visual acuity with correction was 20/20-2 OU. Intraocular pressure was 19/13 mm Hg by applanation tonometry. Examination of the conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, and pupils demonstrated no abnormalities. The yellow, dome-shaped subcutaneous mass was located about 4.0 mm lateral to the lateral canthus of the right eye. No acute inflammatory signs were visible adjacent to the mass. An excisional biopsy was performed, the specimen was fixed in buffered formalin, and the tissue was submitted for histopathological examination. The incision site healed without incident.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Clinical appearance of the mass located lateral to the lateral canthus of the right eye.



Pathological Examination

Gross pathological examination demonstrated a unilocular cystic-appearing mass measuring 6.0 x 5.0 x 4.0 mm and filled with a cheesy tan-white substance. Study by light microscopy revealed a pseudocyst containing amorphous, eosinophilic material with irregular, elongated spaces (Figure 2). One large concentration near the center of the pseudocyst contained a few spindle-shaped nuclei and fine corrugations, suggesting possible sites of crystalline deposits (Figure 3). Examination of this area with polarized light demonstrated parallel birefringent crystals. The lining of the cavity comprised histiocytes, fibroblasts, and rare foreign-body giant cells (Figure 2). Staining with alcoholic eosin Y and viewing with polarized light using the method devised by Shidham and Shidham4 confirmed the presence of urates in this formalin-fixed tissue sample (Figure 4).



View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. A light microscopic view of the excised pseudocyst (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x100). The cavity contains amorphous eosinophilic material.




View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. A high-power view of a larger fragment of the pseudocyst's contents (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x370). Corrugated areas suggest the presence of fine needle-shaped material (arrows).




View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. A section stained with alcoholic eosin Y and viewed under polarized light (hematoxylin–alcoholic eosin Y, original magnification x40). This technique demonstrates abundant birefringent crystals in the interior of the pseudocyst. PL indicates pseudocyst lumen; PW, pseudocyst wall; CR, birefringent crystals.



Comment

There are 3 characteristic pathological findings in gout: acute synovitis with effusion from deposition of crystalline urates secondary to hyperuricemia, chronic arthritis after multiple acute episodes from deposition of urates in the synovial lining and on the articular surfaces, and gouty tophus from localized deposition of crystals in soft tissue and the resultant inflammation.1 Although any joint in the body is at risk, the great toe is involved in 90% of patients, and other joints in the foot, knee, or wrist are commonly affected. Tophi occur in connective tissue and most commonly involve the helix and antihelix of the ear, the bursae adjacent to the olecranon and the patella, and the ligaments surrounding the joints. The renal medulla or pyramids may also show gouty tophaceous deposits.

Ocular involvement in patients with gout may take many forms. Crystalline deposits have been identified in the conjunctiva, sclera, and cornea.5-6 Other ocular conditions associated with gout are scleritis, episcleritis, uveitis, asteroid hyalosis, increased intraocular pressure, and chronically hyperemic conjunctivae.7 However, after studying 69 patients with gout, Ferry et al7 concluded that gout had been overemphasized as a cause of uveitis.

True tophi are rare on the eye or face. Yourish's case report described a "conjunctival tophus associated with gout," but no histopathological examination was performed.5 The crystals he described in and beneath the conjunctiva were identified as a urate salt by chemical reaction. Martinez-Cordero et al6 observed a scleral "tophus," but no inflammation was described, and no histopathological study was recorded. These authors also confirmed the crystals as urates by chemical means. These 2 case reports offered convincing evidence for urate deposition in the sclera and/or conjunctiva in patients with gout, but we do not feel that they meet the strict definition of a tophus. A search of the PubMed database yielded only 2 reports documenting a gouty tophus on the face. One patient had a tophus on the upper eyelid near the lateral canthus2 and the other on the bridge of the nose.3 Histopathological examination confirmed both diagnoses. To the best of our knowledge, ours is only the second report of a gouty tophus on or adjacent to the eyelid.

If the surgeon suspects a gouty tophus, the specimen should be fixed in absolute alcohol rather than buffered formalin to assist the pathologist in identifying the crystalline deposits. The surgeon should also inform the pathologist of the presumed diagnosis so that aqueous reagents are avoided during processing of tissue.

Although most patients with tophi have had gout for many years, the presence of a tophus may be the initial sign of gout, allowing the ophthalmologist to participate in the diagnosis of this important and painful systemic disease. The finding of a lesion similar to the one we have described in a patient with gout should cause the ophthalmologist to consider a gouty tophus in the differential diagnosis of a soft tissue mass on the eyelid.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

This study was supported in part by Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, and the St Giles Foundation, New York, NY.

William R. Morris, MD; James C. Fleming, MD
Memphis, Tenn

Corresponding author: William R. Morris, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Ave, Room D-222, Memphis, TN 38163 (e-mail: wmorris{at}mail.eye.utmem.edu).


REFERENCES

1. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. The musculoskeletal system. In: Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1989:1355-1360.
2. DeMonteynard MS, Jacquier J, Adotti F, Bodard-Rickelman E. Gouty tophus of the eyelid [in French]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1986;86:53-54. PUBMED
3. Rask MR, Kopf EH. Nasal gouty tophus [letter]. JAMA. 1978;240:636. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
4. Shidham V, Shidham G. Staining method to demonstrate urate crystals in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:774-776. PUBMED
5. Yourish N. Conjunctival tophi associated with gout. Arch Ophthalmol. 1953;50:370-371.
6. Martinez-Cordero E, Barreira-Mercado E, Katona G. Eye tophi deposition in gout. J Rheumatol. 1986;13:471-473. PUBMED
7. Ferry AP, Safir A, Melikian HE. Ocular abnormalities in patients with gout. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985;17:632-635. PUBMED

SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Standard Hematoxylin-eosin to Stain Gouty Tophus Specimens
Margo
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:665-665.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.