 |
 |

Intravitreal Antivirals in the Management of Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome With Progressive Outer Retinal Necrosis
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1219-1222.
Retinal infection with herpes varicella zoster in patients with acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) usually produces multifocal outer retinal
whitening that rapidly progresses to confluent, full-thickness retinal necrosis.
This form of necrotizing herpetic retinopathy, known as progressive outer
retinal necrosis, differs from acute retinal necrosis syndrome principally
in the lack of prominent intraocular inflammation.1
Treatment with intravenous antiviral therapy alone has been associated with
a disappointing visual prognosis.2 We report
the visual outcomes associated with the use of combination systemic and intravitreal
antivirals in the management of 7 patients with AIDS with progressive outer
retinal necrosis.
Report of Cases
There were 4 men and 3 women with AIDS (mean age, 34.6 years [range,
27-38 years]) (Table 1). Two of
the 7 patients had a history of cutaneous varicella-zoster virus infection
and 1 had encephalitis. Six of 7 patients had bilateral involvement at the
time of the diagnosis of retinitis, and the remaining patient developed involvement
of the fellow eye within a 2-month period. Median follow-up was 10 months,
with a range of 4 to 30 months. All 7 patients demonstrated clinical features
consistent with progressive outer retinal necrosis.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Patient Demographics and Baseline Data*
|
|
|
Median visual acuity at the time of diagnosis was 20/80 (Table 2). The visual acuity in 8 eyes ranged from 20/20 to 20/80
and 6 eyes were hand motions to no light perception. All patients were able
to see at least 20/60 in at least 1 eye. Retinal lesions were present in zone
3 in all 14 eyes: only in zone 3 in 3 eyes (21%); only in zones 3 and 2 in
3 eyes (21%); and in all 3 zones in 8 eyes (57%). No patient had lesions confined
to only zones 1 or 2. Three of 7 patients (5 eyes) had retinal detachment
at diagnosis, and 3 detachments involved the macula. Of the 9 retinas that
were not detached at diagnosis, 5 were treated with a prophylactic demarcating
laser. One laser-treated retina subsequently detached. All 4 nondetached retinas
that were not treated with the demarcating laser subsequently detached.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Summary of Treatment and Visual Outcome*
|
|
|
All patients received intravenous ganciclovir sodium and foscarnet;
1 patient also received intravenous acyclovir. Two patients (4 eyes) received
intravitreal injections of ganciclovir sodium (2 mg/0.05 mL) and foscarnet
(1.2 mg/0.05 mL). The remaining 5 patients (7 eyes) received intravitreal
injections of ganciclovir sodium (2 mg/0.05 mL). A median of 6 injections
(range, 3-15 injections) during 14 days (range, 6-88 days) were given per
eye. Two eyes with light perception vision were not injected. One eye with
hand motion vision and retinal detachment recovered a visual acuity of 20/80
after injections and retinal detachment repair. Three other eyes with hand
motions or worse vision were injected and had poor visual outcomes.
Five (45%) of 11 treated eyes achieved a final visual acuity of 20/80
or better, and only 2 (18%) of the 11 treated eyes progressed to no light
perception vision. All patients maintained a visual acuity of 20/400 or better
in at least 1 eye. No progression of disease occurred during intravitreal
treatment. Recurrent disease occurred in only 1 eye and was treated successfully
by resumption of both intravenous and intravitreal ganciclovir and foscarnet
therapy.
Comment
In the original series of 38 patients with progressive outer retinal
necrosis treated with intravenous antivirals alone, 42 (67%) of 63 eyes progressed
to no light perception within 4 weeks after diagnosis.2
A subsequent study of 20 patients with progressive outer retinal necrosis
treated with intravenous antivirals reported 19 (49%) of 39 eyes progressing
to no light perception within 6 months.3
The outcomes of patients treated with more than 1 intravenous antiviral agent
were statistically better than those who received only a single drug, but
only 4 (10%) of 39 eyes achieved a visual acuity of 20/80 or better. In a
more recent study of 6 patients with progressive outer retinal necrosis treated
with combination intravenous antivirals, a final visual acuity of 20/80 or
better was achieved in only 2 (22%) of 9 treated eyes.4
In contrast, 5 (45%) of the 12 eyes treated with both intravenous and intravitreal
antivirals (35% of the 14 total eyes) in the current series had a final visual
acuity of 20/80 or better. Five of the 7 eyes with final visual outcomes that
were light perception or no light perception had hand motions to no light
perception at the time of diagnosis.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment also contributes to poor visual outcome
and occurred in about 70% of eyes in the prior series,2-4
in which most retinas detached after treatment was begun. In the current series,
there was a similar total rate of detachments, with 35% detached at the time
of diagnosis and 35% detaching subsequently. However, in the current series,
1 (20%) of 5 retinas treated with a demarcating laser subsequently detached
compared with 4 (100%) of 4 untreated retinas. The more rapid healing from
the use of intravitreal antivirals together with the use of a prophylactic
demarcating laser may have contributed to the reduced rate of retinal detachment
after treatment was begun.
The limitations of comparing results of the current series with results
reported in historical controls should be noted. For instance, the original
series of patients was reported soon after the recognition of progressive
outer retinal necrosis as a syndrome2; earlier
recognition and treatment might have improved the prognosis in these eyes.
In addition, most patients in the originally reported series were treated
with intravenous acyclovir rather than ganciclovir, foscarnet, or combination
systemic antiviral therapy.2 Moreover, the
current use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) likely influences
the prognosis of progressive outer retinal necrosis as it does with cytomegalovirus
retinitis. However, in the current series, only 2 patients were being treated
with HAART (either because the patients were initially examined before the
widespread use of HAART or because of noncompliance with medical therapy).
Finally, although the zones of retinal involvement were known for the patients
in the current series, the retrospective nature of this study does not permit
precise quantification of the baseline extent of disease, which would be necessary,
for instance, to accurately assess the efficacy of laser demarcation in preventing
retinal detachment.
Published information on visual outcomes following the use of intravitreal
antivirals in the management of progressive outer retinal necrosis is limited,
consisting of only 3 reports.5-7
Three (50%) of 6 involved eyes of the reported 4 patients achieved a final
visual acuity of 20/80 or better with intravitreal therapy.
Progressive outer retinal necrosis remains rare enough that it is difficult
to define optimal treatment. Our preferred regimen for intravitreal treatment
is to inject intravitreous ganciclovir sodium (2 mg/0.05 mL) and foscarnet
(1.2 mg/0.05 mL) 3 times weekly for 2 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy
of injections once or twice per week as indicated until the retinitis is stabilized.
Laser photocoagulation to demarcate necrotizing retinitis is applied whenever
possible. Because central nervous system involvement can occur in association
with necrotizing herpetic retinitis,8 we
also use systemic antiviral therapy. Our preferred regimen is intravenous
ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir at induction doses for 3 weeks and intravenous
foscarnet at induction doses for 2 weeks, followed by maintenance antiviral
therapy with oral valganciclovir and intravenous foscarnet until complete
healing is achieved. A successful transition to oral valganciclovir or valacyclovir
can often be made after several weeks of combination antivirals even if there
is no improvement in the immune system.
An appropriate control group with which to compare the poor prognosis
of progressive outer retinal necrosis treated with intravenous antivirals
alone2-4
would be necessary to draw definitive conclusions. However, combination systemic
and intravitreal antiviral therapy may be associated with improved efficacy
in achieving disease resolution, maintaining disease remission, and preserving
visual acuity.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
This study was supported in part by Research to Prevent Blindness Inc,
New York, NY.
Ingrid U. Scott, MD, MPH;
Khoa M. Luu, BS;
Janet L. Davis, MD
Miami, Fla
Corresponding author and reprints: Janet L. Davis, MD, Bascom Palmer
Eye Institute, PO Box 016880, Miami, FL 33101.
REFERENCES
 |
1. Holland GN. Standard diagnostic criteria for the acute retinal necrosis syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:663-667.
ISI
| PUBMED
2. Engstrom RE Jr, Holland GN, Margolis TP, et al. The progressive outer retinal necrosis syndrome: a variant of necrotizing
herpetic retinopathy in patients with AIDS. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1488-1502.
ISI
| PUBMED
3. Moorthy RS, Weinberg DV, Teich SA, et al. Management of varicella zoster retinitis in AIDS. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:189-194.
FREE FULL TEXT
4. Ciulla TA, Rutledge BK, Morley MG, Duker JS. The progressive outer retinal necrosis syndrome: successful treatment
with combination antiviral therapy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29:198-206.
PUBMED
5. Spaide RF, Martin DF, Teich SA, et al. Successful treatment of progressive outer retinal necrosis syndrome. Retina. 1996;16:479-487.
PUBMED
6. Meffert SA, Kertes PJ, Lim P, et al. Successful treatment of progressive outer retinal necrosis using high-dose
intravitreal ganciclovir. Retina. 1997;17:560-562.
ISI
| PUBMED
7. Perez-Blazquez E, Traspas R, Marin IM, Montero M. Intravitreal ganciclovir treatment in progressive outer retinal necrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:418-421.
ISI
| PUBMED
8. Rostad SW, Olson K, McDougall J, Shaw CM, Alvord EC. Transsynapticspread of varicella zoster virus through the visual system:
a mechanism ofviral dissemination in the central nervous system. Hum Pathol. 1989;20:174-179.
PUBMED
SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD
|