You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 8, August 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Small Case Series
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •External Eye Disease
 •Ocular/ Adnexal Tumors
 •Dermatology
 •Melanoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Unusual Carcinomas of the Lacrimal Gland: Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma and Myoepithelial Carcinoma

Damrong Wiwatwongwana, MD; Kenneth W. Berean, MD, FRCPC; Peter J. Dolman, MD, FRCSC; Jack Rootman, MD, FRCSC; Valerie A. White, MD, MHSc, FRCPC

Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(8):1054-1056.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Of all intrinsic lacrimal gland masses, 28% are epithelial neoplasms.1 Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) and myoepithelial carcinoma (MC) are uncommon epithelial malignancies of the salivary gland that have been rarely reported in the lacrimal gland.2 Herein, we report 2 patients with each of these tumors in the lacrimal gland and compare and contrast these unusual neoplasms.

Report of Cases

Case 1

An 86-year-old man presented with painless double vision for 6 months. His visual acuity was 20/30 OD and 20/50 OS. He had a palpable mass under the left superolateral orbital rim and bilateral symmetrically decreased tear function. His palpebral fissure was 9 mm OD and margin reflex distance, 5 mm OD, compared with 6 mm and 3 mm, respectively, OS. Exophthalmometry was 13 mm OD and 16 mm OS. He had limited . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Case 2


Comment

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.