 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Studies of Monocular Trials of Glaucoma Medications: Conflicting Results Explained by Varying Methods
Christopher T. Leffler, MD, MPH
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Chaudhary et al1 studied monocular trials of glaucoma medications. It has been claimed that monocular trials estimate effectiveness better than binocular trials by reducing spontaneous intraocular pressure (IOP) variation, which is correlated between fellow eyes (correlated variation) using contralateral eye control.2-5 Correlated variation sources include tonometer calibration, operator technique, diurnal fluctuation, and systemic factors (eg, blood pressure). Classic theory estimates the initially treated eye response between the baseline (1) and monocular trial visit (2) as (B2 – B1) – (A2 – A1), with A indicating the contralateral eye and B indicating the initially treated eye.
Classic theory is undermined by medicinal crossover to the untreated eye and spontaneous IOP variation, which is not correlated between fellow eyes. Uncorrelated variation might arise, for example, from a momentary intrathoracic pressure increase. Subtracting the contralateral IOP change eliminates correlated variation, but exaggerates uncorrelated variation.3
No study . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Predicting Response to Glaucoma Therapy in One Eye Based on Response in the Fellow Eye: The Monocular Trial
Omar Chaudhary, Ron A. Adelman, and M. Bruce Shields
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(9):1216-1220.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Studies of Monocular Trials of Glaucoma Medications: Conflicting Results Explained by Varying Methods—Reply
Omar Chaudhary, Ron A. Adelman, and M. Bruce Shields
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(5):708.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|