You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 3, March 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(3):346.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 88 words of the full text and any section headings.

The Ridley lens has not been widely adopted, chiefly because of the technical difficulty of inserting the lens behind the iris and the increased hazard of postoperative complications that the procedure entails. But the idea of an intraocular artificial lenticulus to alleviate the disadvantages of aphakia and to correct high refractive errors in patients who retain the crystalline lens has stimulated a number of efforts to improve upon the Ridley lens.

Reference: King JH Jr, Skeehan RA Jr. Acrylic lenses in the anterior chamber. Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;58(3):392-395.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.